🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since that time, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to remove African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to minor insults, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.