🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.