🔗 Share this article

It has been described as one of the largest scams of its type in the Britain.

A total of 14 individuals have been sentenced for their role in a £28m plot to cheat more than 3,500 vacation property investors.

The targets were eager to terminate long-standing holiday ownership agreements and tried to find assistance.

Most were aged between 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them surrendered more than £10,000, and one individual handed over in excess of £80,000.

Those affected were subjected to intense consultations continuing for six hours. They were financially worse off, possessing valueless fake "rewards" and continued to be bound by high-priced timeshare contracts they often use.

The Business At the Heart of the Deception

The firm at the heart of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected customers' funds to finance the owners' lavish lifestyle of private schools, luxury homes and personal aircraft.

The individual at the top of the organization, Mark Rowe, was handed a seven and a half year sentence in January for deceptive scheme.

Recently, his partner one of the co-defendants was part of the concluding cases to hear their sentences.

She received a two-year long suspended jail sentence at the London court after confessing to financial crime.

This has been a long time coming and signifies a significant success for the victims who came forward, the authorities and prosecutors.

How the Probe Started

I first heard about the firm emerged during the summer of 2016. I was working in the investigations unit of a media outlet, making documentary programmes.

A friend noted that his mum had inherited the use of a vacation unit in Spain and, after years of holidays, had started seeking to exit the contract.

It is important to recall how popular timeshares had become with UK travelers in the eighties and nineties.

Holiday ownership allowed families to access the identical property annually, or trade their vacation periods with fellow investors who had properties in different locations. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers took up that option.

The initial boom was linked to a lot of accounts about rip-off merchants mis-selling properties. They appeared frequently on consumer TV programmes.

The standard holiday ownership agreement locked buyers for many years.

At that time, those owners who had experienced their assigned property in the sunshine for a long time were ageing, and a large proportion were looking to say farewell to their timeshares.

Several had health issues and found it difficult to access their properties. Others just felt they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And others had deceased, in frequent situations leaving their heirs to assume the deals - including their yearly fees and upkeep costs.

The Covert Probe Develops

This was the situation the friend's mum had been placed. She searched the web for solutions and came across the company, a enterprise whose website assured to get her out of her contract.

Yet, having paid a fee and arranged an appointment with them, her family had doubts.

Additional investigation uncovered numerous individuals saying they had paid money and received no benefit out of it. In fact, they had been left out of pocket. Substantial amounts.

The reporting group began investigating what was happening. It soon emerged that there were dubious individuals working within the timeshare resale sector.

An attorney had hundreds of individual complaints preparing to take action against the organization.

The team interviewed people who had used the firm and they all told the same story. They thought the company would purchase their timeshare from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were advised there was no potential buyers.

Rather, they were encouraged - actually coerced - to commit further cash acquiring "the company's points system", associated with the outfit's parent company, the overarching entity.

What exactly these were was somewhat vague. They sounded like a kind of currency, giving access to discount travel and benefits and consumer discounts.

And they were seemingly "exchangeable with additional holders, some time down the line.

Paying cash up front now would produce an future return that would offset the company's charges and leave the investor with a gain, liberated eventually from their troublesome agreement.

An unrealistic promise? Indeed, it was.

A 'Misleading Scam'

Based on these descriptions were true, this was a massive scam.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

An operator - specifically the organization - "attracts the customer by marketing a specific service but then to say that's not available, directing the individual in the direction of an alternative, lesser option.

This is against the law. Equipped with all the evidence we had gathered, we presented the rationale to secretly film one of the organization's sessions.

The process requires time, effort, and compelling reasons for why this is the sole method to gather the evidence required to demonstrate illegal activity.

With approval secured, our small team organized a meeting with one of the organization's staff in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Posing as a ordinary individual wanting to get his mum free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement